Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!s03-b39!num02.iad!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!Xbu.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-02.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (0rstrelehan)
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.crafts.pictures
Subject: Re: Req. Would someone digitize this for me? (0/1)
Summary: accept no forgeries- Path ends with--->dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
Organization: ABCP p0stAL
References: <duba0696gk5hqjkh0kgio6obn7fneuast2@4ax.com> <l2bNn.152154$vX7.14677@en-nntp-11.dc1.easynews.com> <NJjNn.186584$3k7.33998@en-nntp-13.dc1.easynews.com> <g3nb06tnj4cebl06mk8d9pf9hg9ceq7g0r@4ax.com>
Lines: 246
Message-ID: <j4CNn.426378$rq1.119062@en-nntp-02.dc1.easynews.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 09:47:26 +1000
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.crafts.pictures:14588
X-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 23:47:28 UTC (s03-b39)
bates <bates@motel.com>wrote:
>On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:54:29 +1000, hopper
>
>>Herb <Herb@the.herb.garden>wrote:
>>>bates wrote:
>>>
>>>> PES 4x4
>>>
>>>OK, you've posted that image 5 times in 25 minutes.
>>>
>>Yes... somewhat over enthused in GN not displaying the
>>original post, I fear <g>
>>
>>>But it looks like it's already BEEN digitized, in order to get
>>>the patch that's seen in the photograph.
>>>
>>Does indeed look that way.
>>
>>>To reproduce it from the photograph would require considerable effort
>>>on someone's part, including completely re-creating the image.
>>>
>>Not so.. really, but the results may vary.
>>I attach a quick poke at the job.
>>
>>>would be MUCH easier and quicker to simply buy either the design or
>>>the completed patch.
>>>
>>IF the job was available, yes.
>>But is not that exactly what we here (ABCP) are about?
>>Getting stuff that is not available?
>>
>>/scraitches haid
>>/confukled
>>
>>My message to Mr. Bates is that as is the same for all
>>requestors.
>>More is best when it comes to requests.
>>AFAIK no keyboard has ever bitten any operator.
>>The keys are not rattler bones..!
>>
>>My guess is that this job is a military patch.. do I
>>have that right?
>>
>>cheers
>
>
>Just trying to make a girly patch for my girlfriend.
>
Right0..
.. ah-sump-chunz.. "the Mother of all stuffups"<g>
Sorry about that.
>She saw this and thought it was cute.
>
It is "neat" as in "to the point", I grant that.
> Not for sale
>Did not mean to post so much. Not meaning to offend
>just having trouble with a slow computer. Hoping it is not
>a virus.
>
Take a tip?
For ABCP it is not wise to accept critique as "having
taken offence", many of us have been at this
(educating newbies)" a looong time and individually
have developed our own 'methods'. You can take it for
granted everyone means well. You will know a 'flame'
when you read one.
It will be very plain ... <bfg>
And that "more is best" I gave out??
Should have read "more is less", meaning the more info
supplied the less 'guessing' and therefore the lower
number of questions.
ummm..
Hold the bus on sewing out that design I put up.. it
was a "test the water" thing.
Attached is an improved version.. as always, test sew.
If them jump stitches prove a PITA,, holler and I will
work it up some more.
Have fun..!
cheers
--
hopper
<< SC_001[35x35].hus >>
|
|