Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!s03-b18.iad!num02.iad!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe11.iad.POSTED!6606bf4c!not-for-mail
From: "hopper" <Pixie@AnnWheatley.com.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.crafts.pictures
References: <0DvKn.12186$7d5.9340@newsfe17.iad> <7ERKn.20613$HG1.9659@newsfe21.iad>
In-Reply-To: <7ERKn.20613$HG1.9659@newsfe21.iad>
Subject: Re: [heads up] <snckleFritz> and <noone00> and <Pogonip> are NetKops [aka] "copyright cops" -- proof inside
Lines: 247
Organization: abuse@octanews.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
Message-ID: <6cFLn.40809$wV.35279@newsfe11.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 01:42:26 UTC
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 21:40:09 -0400
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.crafts.pictures:14465
X-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 18:42:26 MST (s03-b18.iad)
news:7ERKn.20613$HG1.9659@newsfe21.iad...
>
> news:0DvKn.12186$7d5.9340@newsfe17.iad...
>
> "hopper" <Troll5layer@win.win.invalid> wrote in message
> news:DnkLm.10649$rE5.2601@newsfe08.iad...
>
>
> .. at least this is the claim our resident edjut in ABCP makes in this
> post:
> MiD: <ajlqf5tdqt14t4b2odadp0jftcn0r40mbr@4ax.com>
> [two swift left clicks on the underlined
> link will retrieve the post]
> when the edjut asks the question.
> <q>
> By the wat what is your involvement here?
> http://www.sewgirls.com/embroidery/GREAT-OFFER-MORE-THAN-2-MILLION-AMAZING-EMBROIDERY-DESIGNS-8-.htm
> You are clearly at the designers side of the line and you were
> suspected to be c copyright cop in the past and this kind of confirms
> </q>
>
> Now... I myself have been branded "arrogant", and "Troll", by a number
> of peeps posting to ABCP over the many many years of my subscription
> to ABCP.
> Largely I have ignored these accusations and/or aspersions as to my
> personal
> character as I do understand the limitations some face in absorbing the
> written word and indeed in many instances the complete "whoosh" noise
> my posts make as background noise in the heads of those who have no
> interest in Usenet itself, as an information[s] sharing medium in using
> the
> forum
> facilities of ABCP (and other like places), only concerned to "get what I
> want"
> in projecting their own shortcomings into the discussions.
> In fact a very small proportion of that percentage actively engage
> themselves in
> attempts to destroy that which they cannot understand. This is typical
> "playground kiddees" behavior and quite understandable, given the
> development
> obstacles they have failed in achieving solutions for... just one of which
> is the
> continued use of Browers (Outlook Express and Thunderbird/Netscape) in
> reading and posting text messages where a newsreader (Agent) is so much
> more
> proficient and "user friendly" in processing the task.
>
> The reader may then gain some understanding as to why it is I do often wax
> lyrical
> and *do* often _n o t_ simply "hand over the goods".
> Such an attitude can, as said in the heads of some, be construed as
> "arrogant" or "trolling.
> However...
> Much of my work is presented so as to urge the reader to think for
> themselves, much
> of it is a loose cryptic. Not only is this my UPA, it is also the only way
> I
> have
> concluded to have folks _remember_ what they discover.
> There is an old quote I have often used as a sig file and one I firmly
> believe remains
> true for us all.
> ============================================
> We do not cherish that which has not cost us
> longing, labour and love
>
> Hons de Belzer 1796
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> I am rambling , you think...?
> No, not at all.. there is a lesson in those words of Jeans I quote as part
> of
> his post <ajlqf5tdqt14t4b2odadp0jftcn0r40mbr@4ax.com>, a very important
> lesson for those blindly stumbling along in many forums across Usenet
> today.
> And as I do in my earlier post I thank Jean again for the platform to
> deliver
> that lesson in this message/post of mine today.
>
> I refer directly to this recent post of mine.
> I urge one and all to go read the work in its entirety.
> In part <kVIKm.15960$ET3.6628@newsfe17.iad> informs
> "I just finished writing a post extolling the virtues of your use,
> and here you are again delivering Lesson 2 for the day..!
> Thankyou... monkieBoi."
>
> The lesson today is not to be aware of those who will stalk any poster
> they target across not only Usenet but across any forum anywhere they
> can find their target offering comment.
> The lesson today is not to be wary of clicking on URLs provided in Usenet
> posts.
> The lesson today is not to take with a grain of salt that which known
> malcontents/miscreants will post in their work[loose use] to discredit
> excellent members of a community.
> In fact the lesson today is not any defence of any accusation Jean directs
> my way.
> I accept Jeans question as being genuine confusion.
> Jean does not know, Jean will benefit from the lesson.
> As thick as Jean is, he will follow the lesson as fervently as his
> obsession
> drives him to stalk those he is jealous of... and yearns to mimick.
>
> The lesson today is for everyone else, as I myself learnt the lesson long
> ago and to
> this day use that lesson (manipulate it, if you like) as part of my
> UPA - Usenet Performance Art) in presenting what I wish where.
> The lesson is not difficult to follow, it is no big deal as an extra task
> in
> posting.
> It may well be impossible with Browers but in a newsreader it is a simple
> "tick the box" thing, easily toggled.
>
> Ahh.. I hear.. WTF is this lesson..?.. "get to the point Man..!"
>
> Sorry,, you the reader need to remember this lesson and remember it well.
> Soooo... I ask. Why is it Jean is today able to stalk a WWW site to
> discover
> 'information' Jean will then use in a Usenet post to connect the posters
> mentioned
> to his implied accusation I (hopper) am a "copyright cop"????
> Look at the profile of these posters he connects, ask yourself.. are
> these "copyright cops"..????.. they all appear on the site my posts are
> on,
> they
> must be.. right..?.
>
> Jean says posters on that site are "clearly at the designers side of the
> line ".
> These people:
> <snckleFritz> aka <carntfigureitout>
> Fritz joined ABCP in August 2004 posting as <carntfigureitout>.
> In early posts Fritz described herself as a younger Mother of three(IIRC)
> and a qualified Nurse working with kids who had ADD and other ailments of
> the head. Considering herself educated and qualified in "mental health"
> Fritz choose a path to join with a known Troll of that time , one
> GymmyBob/John Bengi.. and thus, still today, is well despised by many
> here in ABCP as a clueless git with a very poor attitude.
> Fritz today still "carntfigureitout" buuut one of the "copyright cops" who
> haunt ABCP..?.. no fskn way..!
> The woman has not got the smarts. Believe that.
> <noone99>
> n99 is a nondescript, possibly very wise and clued up poster.
> Little can be said about that Lady other than the observation her posts
> are always there, conforming, and most appreciative of work shared.
> Definitely not the work of one of the "copyright cops".
> <Pogonip>
> An "English rose" as they say,, Pogonip is one very stoppy Pommie
> lass,, I recommend none cross her <g>.
> On the positive side Pogonip is always there with a helpful hint, quick
> to redirect misinformation back to the Truth and I would offer a
> genuinely "good sport".
> Definitely not the attributes of one of the ABCP "copyright cops".
>
> Soooo.. why..??... WHY are these peeps all posting on that site
> Jean points to??
> Discover.. and find the lesson.
>
> ... good luck in your travels :-)
>
> --
> fup set to ABCP
>
> Here I thought fungal was part of my flock of names I used, once upon a
> time.
>
> Could I be in error?
>
> ahhh, back to Taz or GymmyBob soon!
>
> cheers
>
> --
>
> hopper
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Here we go again
--
Ms Marples
|
|