On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:00:12 +0100, overthemoon<@milkyway.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:28:59 +1000, hopper
>
>>overthemoon<@milkyway.com>wrote:
>>>On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:58:50 -0700, Herb <Herb@the.herb.garden> wrote:
>>>
>>>>overthemoon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>???
>>>>
>>>>Are these people, things, websites, cartoons, software, ??? Are they
>>>>two separate things or a pair, like Lilo and Stitch ???
>>>>
>>>>And what are you asking for? The originals (whatever they are)?
>>>
Yeah, lost me too!
>>>they are the new Oesd 78870(Bernina) timba and lula and they are very
>>>cute bears.
>>>
>>You have a link (URL)????
>>
>>>Thanks for asking.
>>>
>>Herb - nobody - should be expected to :-/
>
It's rather like pointing --> "over there" to a blind person...!!
>>>by the way your not getting cranky on
>>>us now are you? LOL
>
/cue... batting eyes and flash of petticoat...!!
Nice lace!
>>Give the guy a break... Herb is trying to help you help
>>yourself.
>
True.
And Herself was not so sure that Herb wasn't a bit miffed at the sign
language request. She was just doin' the "girl thing" we girls do...
Seein' how far we can push it!
It doan work all the time....
/grin
>I would not dream of giving Herb a hard time, because he is the first
>to help with digitizing and suggestions.
>
Oh, well, there ya go Herb. They only love you for how accommodating
you are... 8-/
There's a clue fella... ! Time to set a few rules and stick wiff 'em.
A few more verbs and adjectives will help everyone... /grin
>>The "LOL" does not "cut it" in masking your (silly)
>>expectation folks have a pipe to your head.
>
>I don't understand that statement.
>
Yeah ya do! You are intelligent enough to yank Herb's chain, then you
are intelligent enough to acknowledge when it being pointed out to
you.
>>Here is the sole content of your REQ.. "banner posted",
>>I would add... how Rude is that..!
>> From: overthemoon<@milkyway.com>
>> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.crafts.pictures
>> Subject: Req: timba and lula thanks
>Yes it was banner posting and I'm very sorry that it upset you, so
>much because normally your very helpful with tutes on abcp if your the
>real hopper as I'm not good at reading headers..
>
It would help, but you don't have to be in this case. Larry got caught
too, by the looks. Another who can't see the forest for the trees.
The real Hopper does not cut and paste like a five year old.
Headers are a help for a quick confirmation, but the cut and paste
effort is just a red flag... even Stevie Wonder would see that!
And yes, Hopper is very helpful with tutes. It's a pity the people who
need them most don't read them and ask a few questions if something is
not getting through.
>>Here is the results of using a search engine on those
>>two names - there were other results.. all
>>pornographic.
>>http://www.embroideryonline.com/products/LicensedDownloadable.aspx?SubID=553&CategoryID=166&DesignType=43&PackType=42
>>Now _why_ should anyone (other than yourself) be
>>required to do your work for you in finding what it is
>>you are asking?
>
>I was not asking anyone to search the internet for them only on their
>computer,.
>
I wouln't have had a clue who they were, if I decided not to run a
query through a search engine.
I am a little "bear" challenged for a start.
It sounded like Disney stuff, but I am cluey enough to realise OESD
does not run with the Disney pack. So, dead end there.
Searching my pooter or searching the 'Net are my only options to help
you, as far as I can see. The fact my hdd is sitting in a
lunchbox waiting to be reinstalled to a new/er pooter, left me
with only the 'Net as a search tool. The name didn't ring any
bells as something I have sewn or cleaned up for filing.
Yer concluding (eh, Hopper! I found another word for ASSuming! yaye!)
that everyone loves bears as much as you!
>>Why indeed should anyone even pay attention as you
>>drive past dropping your order on the stoop and zooming
>>off for a "cawfee" while others work FOR you?
>
>I don't drink cawfee (Coffee) only tea.
>
Tell me you drink it in a cup... please, please, please! I can't be
the only one! /chortle
/adjusts pinkie
>Most posters here will respond
>if they have it, just as I will post requests, which you taught me how
>to, if your the real hopper. I will not comment on the rest as I find
>it very hurtful.
>
>cheers now :-(
>
Uh uh. No tears. The advice was good and nothing more than a chide for
being so scantily enthusiastic in your request.
This group needs MORE chat, NOT less.
More interest and backbone in learning stuff that is foreign to the
average sewing Lady.
We are not computer Ladies, we sew. The problem is, we have
computerised sewing machines. Time to learn a thing or two about
pooters if we are going to survive the experience.
Usenet is not a hand holding sewing environment. We have to adapt just
a little to its ways.
Hopper didn't make those rules. Like Larry is insisting. This is not a
Yahoo froupe.
The rules were here a long time before you or I got here!
You are falling into the trap that the "other hopper" is setting.
By grooming the group to take offence at every helpful hint, he (loose
use) is slowly eating away at the very thing that WILL keep this group
together.
Discussion.
Herb and Hopper were doing nothing but trying to get you to tell them
what you want.
Tell us what you want, what you really, really want.
Yer a big girl. Take the advice how it was meant.
I've been told there is no way to "talk Shakespeare" in telling
someone how to do something.
True.
But if Shakespeare had nuttin' else, He had verbs and adjectives and
He wrote in long hand.... rofl.
Use 'em!!! You'll like 'em... I promise!
Pixie :-))
|
|