Pixie <Pixie@AnnWheatley.com.invalid>wrote:
>On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 05:10:58 +1000, hopper
>
>>Pixie <Pixie@AnnWheatley.com.invalid>wrote:
>>
>>[..]
>>
>>>>Little wonder then the view is maligned.
>>>>
>>>Nuthin' to do with my view if objects appear smaller than they really
>>>are!!
>>>/grin
>>
>>/scraitchin haid
>>
>>heh.. still working through that one, is I :->
>>
>Speed reading again...
>
>It means, my view is excellent!
>Distance from the object is irrelevent.
soooo,,, have I got this right?
You flash by, scanning digitally using sonar,
and expect a 3D output..!
Man.. that's some X-desktop multi-skilling..!
Tell me.. you are excellent at X-stitch.. riiight?
--
hopper
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 |
|