Who cares?
Stop trolling for attention.
"hopper" <Troll5layer@win.win.invalid> wrote in message
news:wBiMm.35205$W77.20727@newsfe11.iad...
> littlemissme <littlemissme@email.invalid>, wrote
>>On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:45:58 +0100, Never-Done-Jean
>><rofl.haress@aemail4u.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:38:01 -0600, BR81@BR81.B wrote:
>>>
>>>Is there a reason to post this here:
>>>
>>>Subject: Re: REQ flowing Texas flag please see inside - Texasflag.rar
>>>(1/1)
>>>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:34:15 -0600
>>>Message-ID: <nv31g5d2n7kj2mkt9ofdimbru2suflutvf@4ax.com>
>>>
>>>and here:
>>>
>>>Subject: Texas flag - Texasflag.rar
>>>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:38:01 -0600
>>>Message-ID: <i7p1g5hp5do97emklbr1e58t3h56knk913@4ax.com>
>>
>>does it really matter that much?
>>
> .. when measured as part of all the other variations of
> demonstrated posting errors made here in ABCP - Deliberately..! ...
> ... by Jean himself, under the default names of the posting
> tool/source used? I refer directly to the floods of Spam Jean posts.
>
> No, LMM..
> .... BR81 like any newb made a small error, and one even an
> expert (?) would occasionally produce. Look at the timelines.
> The first post was made, a few hours later BR8 could not see the post
> listing and chose to post it again. Not at all surprising, given the
> experience the
> lady has had with NewBin not producing a post for her.
> Truly "small bananas" and certainly not worth an agro comment aimed at
> confusing a poster in their first steps.
>
> The reason for Jean's comment has _nothing_ to do with either of BR8's
> posts.. I am sure you can work that out.
> And you can expect much more of the same with each new poster
> discarding his (Jeans) snide jealousies (eventually) to work on getting
> posts to the list that actually work.
> Simply put.. BR81's intent is good work. Jean's is not, at all.
>
> ... thanks for your comments, LMM.
>
|
|