littlemissme <littlemissme@email.invalid>, wrote
>On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:45:58 +0100, Never-Done-Jean
><rofl.haress@aemail4u.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:38:01 -0600, BR81@BR81.B wrote:
>>
>>Is there a reason to post this here:
>>
>>Subject: Re: REQ flowing Texas flag please see inside - Texasflag.rar
>>(1/1)
>>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:34:15 -0600
>>Message-ID: <nv31g5d2n7kj2mkt9ofdimbru2suflutvf@4ax.com>
>>
>>and here:
>>
>>Subject: Texas flag - Texasflag.rar
>>Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:38:01 -0600
>>Message-ID: <i7p1g5hp5do97emklbr1e58t3h56knk913@4ax.com>
>
>does it really matter that much?
>
.. when measured as part of all the other variations of
demonstrated posting errors made here in ABCP - Deliberately..! ...
... by Jean himself, under the default names of the posting
tool/source used? I refer directly to the floods of Spam Jean posts.
No, LMM..
.... BR81 like any newb made a small error, and one even an
expert (?) would occasionally produce. Look at the timelines.
The first post was made, a few hours later BR8 could not see the post
listing and chose to post it again. Not at all surprising, given the experience the
lady has had with NewBin not producing a post for her.
Truly "small bananas" and certainly not worth an agro comment aimed at
confusing a poster in their first steps.
The reason for Jean's comment has _nothing_ to do with either of BR8's
posts.. I am sure you can work that out.
And you can expect much more of the same with each new poster
discarding his (Jeans) snide jealousies (eventually) to work on getting
posts to the list that actually work.
Simply put.. BR81's intent is good work. Jean's is not, at all.
... thanks for your comments, LMM.
|
|