Send in the clones.
Geeesh. Have to make up your own friends.
<wildcat@hushmail.me> wrote in message
news:efprf5hbn3kqkfft634nmhnj870kgtfqck@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:34:37 +1000, hopper
> <Troll5layer@win.win.invalid> wrote:
>
>>
>>[supplementary]
>>
>>>wildcat@hushmail.me, wrote
>>>>On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:10:20 +1000, hopper
>>>><Troll5layer@acting.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>maggy <me@home>, wrote
>>>>>>it is asking for a password :-(
>>>>>
>>>>>maggy????
>>>>>I really would have thought you knew better.
>>>>>
>>>>>Downloading that mess just illustrates how
>>>>>morally bankrupt some are here (ABCP) :-/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I read this post before I downloaded this group of files.
>>>
>>>ok....
>>>According to "maggy" they are passworded (locked), WC.. so
>>>I hope you did only get headers and not the actual files.
>>>
>>>The post is Spam.. deliberately set to list the way it does.
>>>
>>>FYI.. this is an old trick of Jeans.
>>>On this occasion he has (according to maggy) locked the
>>>file/s as a little "gift" :-/
>>>At one time he had a weeks fun egging folks with the
>>>promise of a password. The next time he did it folks
>>>weren't so keen.
>>>But he does it again... braindead, has to be..!
>>>
>>>There is a united loathing of peeps who post locked files to Usenet
>>>in "sharing" groups. That loathing is almost a traditional attribute in a
>>>binding union of articulate members.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Why were there so many and didn't someone post these before?
>>>>
>>>.. ask the edjut to explain again his reason for the quantity.
>>>I am sure *he* didn't understand his first attempt at explanation :-/
>>>Spammers couldn't give a FF[aerial sex] what amount of articles they
>>>post.
>>>
>>>And yes.. I reposted the set just the other day.
>>> Re: [repost] AnitaG_ Owls and Woodlands [was]
>>> AG Quilt #2 [x]blueRope81 - QuiltWork.x.AG.rar (1/4)
>>>BR81 posted them originally so the success rate was very poor.
>>>
>>>>Just trying to get the lay of the land.
>>>>
>>>Smart thought.. yer wont get to know if you don't ask :-)
>>>
>>>A word to the wise, WC..?
>>>IF you have been reading my posts for any length of time you will
>>>know I usually provide links to the information I rely on, or a link to a
>>>direct
>>>quote. This for both Usenet *and* web sources.
>>>Rarely will I provide a link to an actual binary file.
>>>There is a reason for that last reluctance.
>>>
>>>Usenet is no different to the web (www) or eMail in that using links
>>>placed in posts should be treated with caution. Usenet is somewhat safer
>>>in that the material in the link has to be decoded before it is "live".
>>>Anything else is plain text and thus maybe only harmful to the head as
>>>"unwanted information".
>>>However today, with so many tools offered with "auto" functions for
>>>decoding,
>>>there are those who are gravitating towards providing links to material
>>>one would not normally download. This, so as to entrap the unwary user.
>>>As "scurrilous" a practice as that is, it is Usenet and nobody can stop
>>>these
>>>malcontents from posting links.. it is up to the individual to decide
>>>what to
>>>"trust".
>>>
>>>As a rule of thumb for _anywhere_ in Usenet you do not download
>>>_anything_ that
>>>originates from a NL domain, without checking first. One certainly never
>>>uses
>>>any links a known malcontent posts. In ABCP there is only one NL person
>>>who has
>>>begun copying my "style" in using links. A wise person will never use a
>>>link
>>>Jean posts, under any of his used nyms. Period.
>>>
>>>ummm.. IF you aren't sure on how to "check a post" then say so and I will
>>>explain further.
>>>
>>>cheers.
>>
>>
>>JP... the use of my "WC" as a shortcut to your posting name
>>has been brought to my attention as a being a probable insult.
>>This, as Americans use "WC" in reference to the body waste
>>disposal unit of a bathroom facility. I of course was well aware of
>>that small bit of Seppo culture, yet, truly... the connection did escape
>>my scan process when "creating" a shortcut for your name.
>>For any discomfort you may have endured, I am truly sorry.
>>
>>I am "having another go" in using "JP", I am hoping this works out
>>as more appropriate and not at all offensive.
>>JP = "Jungle Pussy".
>>And in the rolling mountains of Malaysia, Indonesia New Guinea/Papua
>>and The "Top End" of Australia "JP" is the oft used slang
>>describing the American equivalent of "wildcat".
>>
>>Wild = Jungle
>>Cat = Pussy
>>
>>.. get it..?..[chuckle]
>>
>>I trust you will accept my humble excuse for an unintentional 'slur'.
>>
>>cheers
>
> No problem, no offense taken. But i must say, I see a wildcat as an
> american football mascot.
>
> Who da thought
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
|