On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:43:11 +1000, hopper aka pixie aka
r(ectum)H(opper) aka phlatarse aka doggieLad aka PeterPoster aka cHips
<Troll@ABCP_acting.invalid> <a_denton@aemail4u.com>
<rofl.haress@aemail4u.com > wrote:
So now all of a sudden you acuse other people of being netcops, well
on the webpage we read clearly:
>QUOTE
snip
Regards
Embroidery_2004
Most interesting. You could certainly do with hiring a webpage
designer.
My card:
rofl.haress @ aemail4u.com
I make mention because.....
..with the significant investment you have made in stocking those
designs
it is a crying shame not to present your business in a professional
way so as
to best provide the best possible mechanism for the return of your
capital,
quickly :-~
Yes, I can do Italian
....and Sicilian but Corsican has me stumped.
Portuguese maybe? :->
cio
Posted by fungal on November 28, 2006, 3:54 am
UseNet Wanker Below
******************
Most interesting. You could certainly do with hiring a webpage
designer.
My card:
rofl.haress @ aemail4u.com
I make mention because.....
..with the significant investment you have made in stocking those
designs
it is a crying shame not to present your business in a professional
way so
as
to best provide the best possible mechanism for the return of your
capital,
quickly :-~
Yes, I can do Italian ....and Sicilian but Corsican has me stumped.
Portuguese maybe? :->
cio
>END
Then explain this rofl.haress.
This is according to what i heard one of the nims YOU used here and
recentely you admitted that.
You only REPOST files that are posted recentely before and like cops
playing hookers and drugsdealers you just as well can play poster and
be a undercover netcop in this group and because you are involved in
quite some shady businesses you are a copyrightcop to me from now on.
I continue my quest in looking for information after you on the
internet and little by little i will find it and use it against you
like you use Jean against me.
>
>
>.. at least this is the claim our resident edjut in ABCP makes in this post:
>MiD: <ajlqf5tdqt14t4b2odadp0jftcn0r40mbr@4ax.com>
> [two swift left clicks on the underlined
> link will retrieve the post]
>when the edjut asks the question.
><q>
>By the wat what is your involvement here?
>http://www.sewgirls.com/embroidery/GREAT-OFFER-MORE-THAN-2-MILLION-AMAZING-EMBROIDERY-DESIGNS-8-.htm
>You are clearly at the designers side of the line and you were
>suspected to be c copyright cop in the past and this kind of confirms
></q>
>
>Now... I myself have been branded "arrogant", and "Troll", by a number
>of peeps posting to ABCP over the many many years of my subscription
>to ABCP.
>Largely I have ignored these accusations and/or aspersions as to my personal
>character as I do understand the limitations some face in absorbing the
>written word and indeed in many instances the complete "whoosh" noise
>my posts make as background noise in the heads of those who have no
>interest in Usenet itself, as an information[s] sharing medium in using the forum
>facilities of ABCP (and other like places), only concerned to "get what I want"
>in projecting their own shortcomings into the discussions.
>In fact a very small proportion of that percentage actively engage themselves in
>attempts to destroy that which they cannot understand. This is typical
>"playground kiddees" behavior and quite understandable, given the development
>obstacles they have failed in achieving solutions for... just one of which is the
>continued use of Browers (Outlook Express and Thunderbird/Netscape) in
>reading and posting text messages where a newsreader (Agent) is so much more
>proficient and "user friendly" in processing the task.
>
>The reader may then gain some understanding as to why it is I do often wax lyrical
>and *do* often _n o t_ simply "hand over the goods".
>Such an attitude can, as said in the heads of some, be construed as "arrogant" or "trolling.
>However...
>Much of my work is presented so as to urge the reader to think for themselves, much
>of it is a loose cryptic. Not only is this my UPA, it is also the only way I have
>concluded to have folks _remember_ what they discover.
>There is an old quote I have often used as a sig file and one I firmly believe remains
>true for us all.
>============================================
>We do not cherish that which has not cost us
>longing, labour and love
>
> Hons de Belzer 1796
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>I am rambling , you think...?
>No, not at all.. there is a lesson in those words of Jeans I quote as part of
>his post <ajlqf5tdqt14t4b2odadp0jftcn0r40mbr@4ax.com>, a very important
>lesson for those blindly stumbling along in many forums across Usenet today.
>And as I do in my earlier post I thank Jean again for the platform to deliver
>that lesson in this message/post of mine today.
>
>I refer directly to this recent post of mine.
>I urge one and all to go read the work in its entirety.
>In part <kVIKm.15960$ET3.6628@newsfe17.iad> informs
>"I just finished writing a post extolling the virtues of your use,
>and here you are again delivering Lesson 2 for the day..!
>Thankyou... monkieBoi."
>
>The lesson today is not to be aware of those who will stalk any poster
>they target across not only Usenet but across any forum anywhere they
>can find their target offering comment.
>The lesson today is not to be wary of clicking on URLs provided in Usenet posts.
>The lesson today is not to take with a grain of salt that which known
>malcontents/miscreants will post in their work[loose use] to discredit
>excellent members of a community.
>In fact the lesson today is not any defence of any accusation Jean directs my way.
>I accept Jeans question as being genuine confusion.
>Jean does not know, Jean will benefit from the lesson.
>As thick as Jean is, he will follow the lesson as fervently as his obsession
>drives him to stalk those he is jealous of... and yearns to mimick.
>
>The lesson today is for everyone else, as I myself learnt the lesson long ago and to
>this day use that lesson (manipulate it, if you like) as part of my
>UPA - Usenet Performance Art) in presenting what I wish where.
>The lesson is not difficult to follow, it is no big deal as an extra task in posting.
>It may well be impossible with Browers but in a newsreader it is a simple
>"tick the box" thing, easily toggled.
>
>Ahh.. I hear.. WTF is this lesson..?.. "get to the point Man..!"
>
>Sorry,, you the reader need to remember this lesson and remember it well.
>Soooo... I ask. Why is it Jean is today able to stalk a WWW site to discover
>'information' Jean will then use in a Usenet post to connect the posters mentioned
>to his implied accusation I (hopper) am a "copyright cop"????
>Look at the profile of these posters he connects, ask yourself.. are
>these "copyright cops"..????.. they all appear on the site my posts are on, they
>must be.. right..?.
>
>Jean says posters on that site are "clearly at the designers side of the line ".
>These people:
> <snckleFritz> aka <carntfigureitout>
>Fritz joined ABCP in August 2004 posting as <carntfigureitout>.
>In early posts Fritz described herself as a younger Mother of three(IIRC)
>and a qualified Nurse working with kids who had ADD and other ailments of
>the head. Considering herself educated and qualified in "mental health"
>Fritz choose a path to join with a known Troll of that time , one
>GymmyBob/John Bengi.. and thus, still today, is well despised by many
>here in ABCP as a clueless git with a very poor attitude.
>Fritz today still "carntfigureitout" buuut one of the "copyright cops" who
>haunt ABCP..?.. no fskn way..!
>The woman has not got the smarts. Believe that.
> <noone99>
>n99 is a nondescript, possibly very wise and clued up poster.
>Little can be said about that Lady other than the observation her posts
>are always there, conforming, and most appreciative of work shared.
>Definitely not the work of one of the "copyright cops".
> <Pogonip>
>An "English rose" as they say,, Pogonip is one very stoppy Pommie
>lass,, I recommend none cross her <g>.
>On the positive side Pogonip is always there with a helpful hint, quick
>to redirect misinformation back to the Truth and I would offer a
>genuinely "good sport".
>Definitely not the attributes of one of the ABCP "copyright cops".
>
>Soooo.. why..??... WHY are these peeps all posting on that site
>Jean points to??
>Discover.. and find the lesson.
>
>... good luck in your travels :-)
|
|