Wow! A TAz clone asks!!
What a surprise!
Stop trolling for attention hopeless cripple!
Get off the computer, go back on your therapy and get off the welfare scam.
<wildcat@hushmail.me> wrote in message
news:ej5mf550uh4k6ev6k8inmkht666jlaruks@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:39:44 +1000, hopper
> <Troll5layer@acting.invalid> wrote:
>
>>wildcat@hushmail.me, wrote
>>>On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:10:20 +1000, hopper
>>><Troll5layer@acting.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>maggy <me@home>, wrote
>>>>>it is asking for a password :-(
>>>>
>>>>maggy????
>>>>I really would have thought you knew better.
>>>>
>>>>Downloading that mess just illustrates how
>>>>morally bankrupt some are here (ABCP) :-/
>>>
>>>
>>>I read this post before I downloaded this group of files.
>>
>>ok....
>>According to "maggy" they are passworded (locked), WC.. so
>>I hope you did only get headers and not the actual files.
>>
>>The post is Spam.. deliberately set to list the way it does.
>>
>>FYI.. this is an old trick of Jeans.
>>On this occasion he has (according to maggy) locked the
>>file/s as a little "gift" :-/
>>At one time he had a weeks fun egging folks with the
>>promise of a password. The next time he did it folks
>>weren't so keen.
>>But he does it again... braindead, has to be..!
>>
>>There is a united loathing of peeps who post locked files to Usenet
>>in "sharing" groups. That loathing is almost a traditional attribute in a
>>binding union of articulate members.
>>
>>
>>>Why were there so many and didn't someone post these before?
>>>
>>.. ask the edjut to explain again his reason for the quantity.
>>I am sure *he* didn't understand his first attempt at explanation :-/
>>Spammers couldn't give a FF[aerial sex] what amount of articles they post.
>>
>>And yes.. I reposted the set just the other day.
>> Re: [repost] AnitaG_ Owls and Woodlands [was]
>> AG Quilt #2 [x]blueRope81 - QuiltWork.x.AG.rar (1/4)
>>BR81 posted them originally so the success rate was very poor.
>>
>>>Just trying to get the lay of the land.
>>>
>>Smart thought.. yer wont get to know if you don't ask :-)
>>
>>A word to the wise, WC..?
>>IF you have been reading my posts for any length of time you will
>>know I usually provide links to the information I rely on, or a link to a
>>direct
>>quote. This for both Usenet *and* web sources.
>>Rarely will I provide a link to an actual binary file.
>>There is a reason for that last reluctance.
>>
>>Usenet is no different to the web (www) or eMail in that using links
>>placed in posts should be treated with caution. Usenet is somewhat safer
>>in that the material in the link has to be decoded before it is "live".
>>Anything else is plain text and thus maybe only harmful to the head as
>>"unwanted information".
>>However today, with so many tools offered with "auto" functions for
>>decoding,
>>there are those who are gravitating towards providing links to material
>>one would not normally download. This, so as to entrap the unwary user.
>>As "scurrilous" a practice as that is, it is Usenet and nobody can stop
>>these
>>malcontents from posting links.. it is up to the individual to decide what
>>to
>>"trust".
>>
>>As a rule of thumb for _anywhere_ in Usenet you do not download _anything_
>>that
>>originates from a NL domain, without checking first. One certainly never
>>uses
>>any links a known malcontent posts. In ABCP there is only one NL person
>>who has
>>begun copying my "style" in using links. A wise person will never use a
>>link
>>Jean posts, under any of his used nyms. Period.
>>
>>ummm.. IF you aren't sure on how to "check a post" then say so and I will
>>explain further.
>>
>>cheers.
>
>
> So Hopper, tell me more!!!
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
|