Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!news.astraweb.com!border5.newsrouter.astraweb.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe14.iad.POSTED!6606bf4c!not-for-mail
Reply-To: "Taz is a Twat" <X-Complaints-to: abuse@baytsp.net..au>
From: "Taz is a Twat" <Mark@baytsp.net.au>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.crafts.pictures
References: <0068757e$0$6926$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <b3bef5hf2b99rttlc0dsusr82impb0c38j@4ax.com> <00687b71$0$6926$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <lhcef5dsbdmd42aka188tjjm2ei0a9umcd@4ax.com> <007308f9$0$23469$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <pneef5pq16823379nimur8ge6iloeqppra@4ax.com> <pqvgf5p24p34impoc5f9iggefu795f5te5@4ax.com> <aq0hf5di40sk7aivqi1mqheo59m4sd36h5@4ax.com> <hp2hf5pgjohud3ja3n92bnv2ierblhn6uc@4ax.com> <ac9if5t4hge1tu7qta6ju9gvnb31hpos1e@4ax.com> <f5hif5pfui0h7q0kapjl0o22aih0cl3ddq@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: ATT. Hopper .BSA badge
Lines: 111
Organization: X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.baytsp.net.au
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Message-ID: <I5cKm.4688$ky1.787@newsfe14.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:26:32 UTC
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:26:30 -0500
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.crafts.pictures:11095
Stop trolling for attention!
Post the goods. You don't sew with them anyway.
"hopper" <Troll5layer@acting.invalid> wrote in message
news:f5hif5pfui0h7q0kapjl0o22aih0cl3ddq@4ax.com...
> sewsandy <sewsandy@here.com>:sayed
>>On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:48:59 +1000, hopper
>><Troll5layer@acting.invalid> wrote:
> [..]
>
>>Thank you it's just the nut part of the logo , there would be no name
>>on it, does that make it easier?
>>
> ahh.. Ok.. I assumed a company logo as such.
> .. mea culpa
>
> You have a couple of "artiste" residing right here.
> They have provided work before today.
> Posting a REQ for a vector graphic only may just do the trick :-)
>
> /snipT
>
>>>We had this turkey here doing the same thing maybe 12 months ago.
>>>Seems its pilgrimage time again //laffff
>>>
>>>ooRoo
>>
>>Obviously have nothing better or constructive to do , or people to
>>converse with , how sad .
>>
> Without waxing lyrical on the topic, IT is precisely why I am so hard
> on folks to stay on top of posting and their personal security.
> This edjut is either actually employed by someone (yes, IT is stealing
> someone's hard cash, operating under false pretences as a Usenet Xpurt
> in selling IT's services), or it is unhinged from a twisted hurt from
> what has been done to IT here (Usenet).
> The focus IT has on peeps here being thieves is just not true. There
> are a few, of course .. those that resell what is uploaded here, but
> the rest of us are just a general mix of older crafters interested in
> an art form, basically.
>
> anyway.. I said I wouldna wax lyrical <g>
>
>>Must also be a bit dim
>>
> It is that, and a thief indeed, as said previously.
> I read you are an employer of sorts.
> What do expect most from your employees?
> Is it not "honesty" first?
>
>>because you are awake
>>when I'm asleep , we are opposite sides of the world ,
>>
> Yep.. I make you at around 9-10 hours behind us (.au), given you
> are sitting down to your morning cuppa and I have just finished
> watching the 7.00pm news on Aunty:
> http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/
>
>> different sexes
>>
> well.. it doan really matter (to me) but yeh.. I hope so ../lafff
>
>>and you know what your doing
>>
> ... on Usenet and file management and protocols and application
> handling kind of stuff...?... most assuredly.
> On digitising and sewing generally..?.. dead set clueless..!
>
> Which brings me to a question.
> Answering it is not compulsory.
> I see you offering comment on Herb's latest offering from "Click n
> Stitch"... I saw similar from a lady a while back where her "fix" was
> to "whip out the dexta pen" and colour in the missing bits on the
> sewout. I attach a part screenview of the HannyManny post, having
> hidden the black outline sequence, and ask... is it the case that
> there is no design which can be produced and still meet _all_ the
> criteria the sewer requires?
>
> There are a number of reasons for asking, and I wouldn't even only you
> are saying you want to "get my head around this digitizing lark ".
> Same here. I watch and learn.. a lot.
> In getting my head around this digi thing I tried the "click n go"
> methods and I couldn't see how the quality was even close to
> presentable. I consulted with another member (since passed away) and
> his advice was to forget that path and concentrate on manual punching
> using a CAD tool. This is what I did, and have been for some years
> (intermittently) since. Things that have held me back is in
> determining just what is good work and what isn't. There is no sewing
> machine in this house, never has been and never likely to be. I had a
> RL friend who actually started me on this road (long story) and she
> sewed up a storm.. but she hacked everything. Like, buy a pattern..
> rip open the bag and say "oh that's not good "..snip went the
> scissors. "I'll put this in here and tuck that and it will be fine"..
> to a bride's dress..!
>
> I examine stitching and stitch sequences. I am thinking the astute
> sewer does to.. and changes some.So, given where there are stitches
> missing altogether and stitch angles totally askew, is then such
> anomalies acceptable as "good enough"?
>
> I am currently puzzling over a car design where I am having this very
> dilemma. Do I let it go and give the work to the sewer to "adjust" or
> do I sit here tearing my hair out adjusting angles to get the "look"
> just right?
> What does a sewer think?
>
>
>
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
|