Hopper
I attached the jpg but it didn't show , have attached it again.
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:07:59 +0000, sewsandy <sewsandy@here.com>
wrote:
>On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:08:08 +1000, hopper
><Troll5layer@acting.invalid> wrote:
>
>>sewsandy <sewsandy@here.com>, wrote
>>>Sorry I vanished without warning , had major computer problems and am
>>>now back up and running with many lessons learnt! lol.
>>
>>Positives in all of it, eh ? :)
>>
>>>will be sending
>>>a photo asap of the bsa logo , the gentleman loved it !
>>>
>>I do hope it wears well :-)
>>
>>As you can see I am no sewer and thus my 'engineering' is
>>largely based on what others (who do know) produce and
>>recommend. There is then always the risk of something
>>"undoing". It is only my mistakes that will assist me in
>>growing. As devout are my efforts I am aware they
>>are not like the rest of me... perfect :-^
>Hopper ,Good Morning.
> Please see the attached photo , I changed your design slightly (hope
>you don't mind) photo A was the design as you digitised it (minus the
>ROO..lol) but it stitched out too dense so I enlarged it (PHOTO B) in
>PE Design but didn't press the button that maintains the density and
>fill . I felt that the lettering needed to be a bit bolder so removed
>your lettering and then made a jpg of what I wanted in photodraw and
>digitized it, then added it to your design. Photo c was the design I
>went with and it looked great , sorry I didn't get a photo of the
>fleece but I was a bit rushed at the end.I hope this makes sense and
>as I have confessed before I'm very new at this but learnt loads just
>by looking a your design and the different sections.
>Please let me know your thoughts on the stich out (I was also
>experimenting with the colours of the guns and text).The photo's are
>not to good as I had to take them in artificial light as it's night
>here.
>
>over 2 u :)
>
>>>Anyway will be back in full swing as soon as my computer has
>>>everything back on it (took me ages to get this sorted). PC
>>>housekeeping is going to be top priority now!lol
>>>Have consumed much tea the last 2 weeks.
>>>
>>.. and no doubt broken many a matchstick in maintaining
>>an open eye..???? :-)
>>
>>For future thought?
>>
>>I have done this before, not with a lot of success in ABCP I will admit..
>>but it may be worth another run as the noise has abated some these days.
>>It is this...
>>For XP users/devotees (only) I have a "method" for archiving and restoring
>>a new computer that does away with "reformat and reinstall", as such.. and
>>greatly simplifies the restoration of a box as the user has set it up.
>>We all know it can take days.. weeks even, to get a new install back
>>to that same configuration used when the whole thing went BANG!.
>>Today.. with Microshaft having largely left XP users behind
>>(as they do with all their GUIs) there is no chance XP is going beyond
>>XP-SP3 as an "upgrade on line".
>>For the majority of users SP3 will fulfill all functions well into the future
>>and MS is unlikely to place restrictions on hardware that will outdate that
>>version of the XP GUI ... in the foreseeable future.
>>I can see people looking to using a stable system well beyond
>>Windows 7 (another social experiment of MS doing) and therefore
>>quietly offer an upload with directions that will allow the astute user
>>to maintain control of their box in a 32bit environment AND restore
>>the whole thing to "as I had it" in just a <1 hour timeframe.
>>This method is what I use on the Windows boxes I control and have
>>done since XP-SP1 "hit the streets".
>>IF that "speil" promotes any interest, merely tag the post for
>>directions to an upload.
>>
>>>talk soon my friend.
>>
>>Looking forward to that.. and your thoughts on my 'David'
>>so far I have only had not so complimentary feedback.. and that is
>>good too :-)
|
|
 - BSA LIGHTCAR.jpg (0/1)')){kind=link}