On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:57:01 +1000, hopper
<Troll5layer@acting.invalid> wrote:
>sewsandy <sewsandy@here.com>, wrote
>>On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 09:30:53 -0500, "Taz is a Twat"
>><Mark@xxxxxx.net.au> wrote:
>>
>>>hmmmm... same message ID, same newsprovider and same browser... again.
>>>
>>>What a surprise.
>>Sorry I don't understand your problem , why wouldn't I use the same as
>>before. And why are you so aggressive!
>>>
>pssssssssst... Sandy..?
>IT has been declared "Black".
>
>That 'method' is a shortcut to let folks know
>this edjut has nothing to offer the Group.
>I judge that from many years of interaction with like
>minds [loose use]. Play with IT if you wish but I can tell you
>now nothing will be gained with which you can positively do
>anything.
>There are places on Usenet where IT can survive.
>Best if we allow it to gravitate to those 'holes'.
>
>Here is the link to my declaration:
><qo0af5lqhaab02imm24rsp554e9083l7ad@4ax.com>
>Two (swift) left licks of the mouse (on the link) will invoke
>Agent to retrieve the post using Message-ID..
>
> cheers
Don't know what his problem is but I don't have time for childish
games, so I used my killfilter for the first time...how liberating.
sandy
|
Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
|