Pixie <Pixie@AnnWheatley.com>, wrote
>On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:13:28 -0800, Herb <Herb@the.herb.garden> wrote:
>
>>Pixie wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>Herb <Herb@the.herb.garden>:sayed
>>>>
>>
>>>>>Interesting that this is the only group getting them.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>[Is this right, Herb..??.. you have looked?]
>>>>
>>>
>>> I did, not true.
>>> It's not being "crossposted" from what I can gather, (without having
>>> to download one).
>>> It doesn't seem to be the same subject line for each, is all.
>>> Someone has too much time on their hands....
>>
>>Right. I'd searched for the same subject words but looking directly
>>finds the crap all over the place.
>>
>I don't get out much... /grin
>I just hope no one in here gets curious. They'll only be curious once.
>It's fatal. Not even a boot up beep, from what I've been told.
>An' I doan haveta be told twice!
>
Depends on which poison you choose.. heh heh heh
One lot simply slows XP to a crawl as it madly tries to get past
the firewall.
No. I diddun open ports just to see what happened.
Another flavour removes the boot code from the master boot record
of a SATA hard drive which then requires a few tricks to restore that.
I mention the latter as most folks would be running SATA drives these days
whilst not being aware of it. I would offer the same effect would happen with an
IDE drive but no machine to test with.. at the moment.
Those tests were on the early lot posted with GN.
So,, an admission...?.. I made a mistake yesterday (in haste) and today I see
the posts are now coming from www.usenetserver.com
a known hangout for sPammers.
My sincere apologies for slighting GN with such activity!!
[insert humongous TIC here]
No matter.. there is certainly no pR0n in those files.
The size is all wrong.
Take that to the Bank.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|