Absolutely right.
He never is able to stand in the shadow of Herb.
His desecration of the English language is one of the reasons.
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:43:24 -0400, "Taz is a Twat"
<Taznobrain@invalid..com> wrote:
>Best to put this Usenet terrrorist in your bozo bin.
>
>He has been terrorizing this group for many years and will stalk you for
>years online if he feels threatened by you. Always a mouthful of golden
>garbage from his wheelchair, he loves to play the Internet guru and cries
>like a baby when exposed...over and over it has happened, so many time here.
>
>He really wants to call himself "Herb" but can't get the respect he needs so
>badly from the crowd he constantly abuses and terrorizes. Notice how nobody
>ever responds to his posts unless they are typically a sock puppet name he
>uses at the time to look well liked and admired by the crowd. He spends
>almost 100% of his life time scamming the group using various computers and
>fudging the .ini files from his various Usenet browsers to look like
>somebody he isn't and not be discovered. This especially true after being
>exposed for being involved with kiddie porn, some time back.
>
>Mental illness will soon become quite apparent as so many others have
>discovered. He really knows very little about the Internet but fakes helping
>in order to resolve his insecuity from the accident.
>
>Now watch as he tries to skirt the issue by attacking my posting style or
>spelling, just before clicking the ignore poster option.
>
>
>"cherryade" <@blossom.com> wrote in message
>news:pl9je59opi93ond8ib5rbqmig5u04or9k2@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:50:37 +1000, hopper
>> <Troll5layer@acting.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> From: cherryade<@blossom.com>
>>> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.crafts.pictures
>>> Subject: bluerope81:thank you
>>> Message-ID: <9dvge59jds6sl2bmede1sea4nqku962ecb@4ax.com>
>>>
>>>Ms. Cherryade...
>>>Is it so unreasonable to ask you to quit with thanking a Spammer
>>>for what they inject into this group, deliberately, as Spam?
>>>Show us, convince us, this is an unreasonable request.
>>>
>>>The BR poster has been approached by a number of people,
>>>in different ways, for months. The BR poster refuses to hear
>>>any of it.
>>>It can be reasonably concluded the BR posts are being used
>>>as a"hammer" to create confusion for the downloader
>>>(like Ging - as a recent example).
>>>Are you then in agreeance with such methods of disrupting this NG?
>>>
>>>There is nothing new here in the action of BR.
>>>Below is the attempt by Herb and myself to sort the BR posts to a
>>>solution.
>>>Take note of the posting date.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>For the audience;
>>>In the content of the text below is my "work-around" for decoding
>>>BR posts. Whilst the info is public domain I would discourage anyone from
>>>posting a "thank you" to the Spammer. Hundreds/thousands of people having
>>>to
>>>apply "patches" to get downloads from posts made by people who are intent
>>>on
>>>destroying groups (and thereby Usenet itself) is not the way forward.
>>>
>>>thank you for listening.
>>
>> thank you for your post. I am not as eloquent as you so this is a
>> short note. I had not seen Herb's solution to BR posts, thanks for
>> that.I did not used to thank anyone at for anything, but that seems to
>> put new posters off. So untill next time a small pretty please ease up
>> for now or you will end up with a heart attack or worse and as you are
>> very helpful putting usall in the know. thanks again
>> cherryade
>>>
>>>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>From: Herb <Herb@the.herb.garden>
>>>Subject: Re: What to do with SOME corrupted attachments
>>>References: <%QcAl.75265$UR4.45057@en-nntp-09.dc1.easynews.com>
>>><i6s2t4p6jufb3iqqdvkr7fdjcfjtoh6isf@4ax.com>
>>>Message-ID: <gFeAl.104515$9j5.21477@en-nntp-01.dc1.easynews.com>
>>>Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:50:02 -0700
>>>
>>>hopper wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Herb <Herb@the.herb.garden>
>>>>
>>>>>If the attachment is a Rar archive file it can usually be repaired.
>>>>>
>>>>>1) Save the attachment - and remember where you saved it :)
>>>>>2) Open WinRar
>>>>> Do NOT double click on the file - that will fail.
>>>>> Just go directly to a WinRar icon and open the program.
>>>>>3) Navigate to the folder where you saved the attachment.
>>>>>4) RIGHT-click on the attachment and select 'repair archive'
>>>>> (alternatively, just select it and press Alt-R)
>>>>>
>>>>>Answer yes or ok or continue to all the messages, no matter how
>>>>>ominous they sound.
>>>>>
>>>>>You will now have a file with the word "Rebuilt." ahead of the rar
>>>>>file name. You can now open this or extract or save or whatever you
>>>>>would have done originally.
>>>>>
>>>>>Some of the included contents might be lost, or they might all be
>>>>>there. In the case of BlueRope's posts, everything is there. He or she
>>>>>appears to be using NewsBin Pro 5.51, which is a good news READing
>>>>>program, but a less than optimum news POSTing program.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Herb
>>>>
>>>> Herb, your description only works where the "put recovery record"
>>>> option is ticked/set by the poster.
>>>
>>>Working on the 869 post ...
>>>'LittleMissMe' said that Winrar gave up with 'no recovery record
>>>found'. Don't yet know what version of Winrar she's using,
>>>But with 3.71 it sailed through and fixed it.
>>>> By default Winrar is not installed with that option as a positive value.
>>>
>>>Is there a way to get the properties of a .rar archive that shows
>>>things like whether or not it has a recovery record, built 'solid' and
>>>other attributes?
>>>
>>>> A method that works for *every* corrupted archive, where it is the
>>>> crc value that is creating the error dialog, is to save the file as a
>>>> unix text file then manually comb through the file to remove the
>>>> faulty code, or join with good code as the case may be.
>>>> Importing the repaired file to Agent will list the archive for
>>>> decoding by Agent.
>>>
>>>Pretty tricky for most! In this case, when winrar recovers it, it
>>>states that the archive header is corrupt.
>>>
>>>Interestingly, if I tell it to treat the archive as 'solid' it creates
>>> one folder. If I say not to, it creates the contents as a folder
>>>within a folder. The source of BlueRopes problem may be that his/her
>>>version of Winrar doesn't handle nested folders well.
>>>
>>>> Given some are not able to set the recovery option in the first place
>>>> (so easy to do) then the above method is likely impractical for the
>>>> downloaders here.
>>>> [ps] I have seen "thank you" posted for files which are incomplete
>>>> [ps]or not recoverable at all. Those thank you posts help nobody.
>>>
>>>Agree.
>>>
>>>> For the yEnc posts pointed to there exists an easy method to
>>>> recover the files.
>>>> Again, save the archive as a unix text file and feed it to this yEnc
>>>> tool.
>>>> http://www.yenc32.com/
>>>> The tool will decode the archive from raw text and deliver the
>>>> files as they were packed.
>>>> Observation shows many posters are using yEnc encoded posting
>>>> so the above method may deliver more product than relying on
>>>> Winrar rebuilds.
>>>> Why it is yEnc is so popular in uploads of designs is a mystery.
>>>> The files are too small to warrant using that encoding.
>>>
>>>I agree. There are enough Outlook Express and Mozilla based
>>>newsreaders being used that yEnc posting generally hurts more than it
>>>helps. OTOH, many European users pay by the byte so it saves them a
>>>few bits here and there.
>>>
>>>
>>>> But what do I know :)
>>>
>>>Quite a bit, it would seem!
>>>
>>> --- Herb
>>
>
|
|