On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:22:12 +1000, hopper
<Troll5layer@acting.invalid> wrote:
>sewsandy <sewsandy@here.com>, wrote
>>On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:11:24 +1000, hopper
> [..]
>>>Then best you set MOE to reply to the thread.
>>>Herb might explain this better?
>>What's MOE sorry I've only just got round what lol means when people
>>text me....must be a sign of my age!
>/chuckles
>We are all in the same boat, dear.
>Average age here is high 60's.
I'm a baby then at late 40's so still time to learn lots.lol
>
>"Baby Boomers" and those who survived being a Hippy <bfg>
>oh.. mybad.. I left out the "burn the bra" mob.. a few of them
>too <evenBFG>
>
>
>>>AFAIK.. you just hit "reply to" and do not change the Subject
>>> line.. as you have done.
>>sorry I couldn't find the thread, I set it to watch the thread but it
>>has just vanished and I only had a copy of the message I sent.
>>>
>When you know what went wrong, that is fine.
>No big deal.
>I only concern myself with those who do not know.
>Those that know better and yet insist on being an arse,, I gave up
>on them a loooong time ago.
>Too many "good people" out there who do appreciate a "hand up".
>heh.. even IF I have to shove it up their arse to get their head to
>turn... heh heh heh
>
>'scuse the french <g>
>It is an old joke from a lost friend of mine.
>Has to do with camels and bricks and water and drinking.
>The lady was only a shortie but a head that held a lot of
>humour and wisdom.
>... sorely missed herself is.
>
>>>It all helps when the conversation "flows" under the one thread.
>>>Chasing folks responses over the group is how folks get confused.
>>Once again sorry I didn't know what else to do.
>>>
>OKees
>.. look, the biggest favour you can do yourself is to read those tutorials and
>the mini-FAQ posted.
>If you cannot get them, say so and I will either repost so you can
>OR
>give you links to similar information that will get you started.
>The tutorials are important as they have "Group specific" information.
>You wont get that .. "off the net".. k?
Can you point me in their direction please and I will read
>
>>>Any post of mine (for new work) will not give you "sight recognition".
>>>Trust me on that score.
>>> Also they will be RaRd so that archive site cannot grab them.
>>>So, you have some work to do in the meantime :-)
>>Sorry you have lost me here, at the risk of sounding dense when you
>>say RaRd do you mean a Rar File.Please tell me what I need to be doing
>>? I can get Rar files if that what it means!!!!
>>>
>Yep.. The *.rar format.
Way to go I got that right ! lol
>
>Sorry.. I slip into Usenet slang occasionally.
that's ok I will try to work it out or ask!
>It has "got me into trouble" before today.. but like most Netizens I
>assume people reading Usenet do read and thus are capable of
>working stuff out by observing. May sound presumptuous to newbs but that is "how
>it is". Roughly simplified "if you feed dickheads the place will fill up with
>them. And then we _all_ "miss out".
>Something like that is what I found here in ABCP in 2004.
>Children being fed sweets and being abused were they to bitch about
>anything... but that is old news :-)
>
>>>IIH.. a newsreader follows threads for you, automatically.
>>Shall I put the kettle on now and reflect !!! lol
>
>heh heh.. it will help.. you :-)
and thank you for your help
|
|
')){kind=link}