On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 05:34:30 GMT, in alt.binaries.crafts.pictures Isew
<Isew@onthetreadle.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:24:57 +1000, hopper
><Troll5layer@home.busy.post.n0.bills.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 21:44:18 GMT, in alt.binaries.crafts.pictures Isew
>><Isew@onthetreadle.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:57:39 +1000, hopper
>>><Troll5layer@home.busy.post.n0.bills.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:52:38 GMT, in alt.binaries.crafts.pictures Isew
>>>><Isew@onthetreadle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Herb could you digitise this without the satin border and white
>>>>>baground Tia
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>look very carefully
>>>>i post it only once
>>>I do not understand your reply
>>
>>I don't understand your reply, so we are
>>even, yeh?
>>
>>>why are you so insulting
>>
>>Why are you so challenged by truth?
>>Feeling a tad "precious" today are we, possums?
>>
>>Some solid advice for you to take with you.. if nothing else.
>>
>> Where you are going to reply to post you are not
>> familiar with the style of, go read _all_ posts by that
>> Author _before_ you leap to a judgement.
>>
>>I did, for you, hence I know _exactly_ what I have to do...
>>now read on McDuff.
>>
>>> I only asked for someone to help digitise
>>>
>>Please listen very carefully.. I say this only once.
>>
>>Never attempt to divert the course of a thread by lying.
>>Folks are a lot smarter than you give them credit for.
>>
>>/takes your twinky nose and rubs it in this:
>>" Herb Can You Help"
>>
>>Herb is not "someone", at all.
>>Herb is a netizen of some repute and a well respected
>>character of this group and others.
>>You have posted a question with an implied
>>expectation - directly to a member of ABCP..
>>This is not how Usenet works.
>>
>>And you have been reading the group long enough
>>to know this IF you read anything more than replies
>>to your own posts.. another 'requirement' of group
>>participation.
>>
>>
>>>this there is no need for insults.
>>>
>>This is your view/opinion.
>>I do not share it and I _know_many others would not
>>share it either.
>>Trust me.. IF I wanted you to feel insulted you would
>>not be responding ****at all***..
>>Very possible you would instead be checked in at
>>Calvary Hospital, just down the road!!
>>
>>You are being motivated, is all.. and I will expand to
>>say why that is.
>>Aussies are very few in number anywhere across Usenet.
>>Without going to why that is, I say to you the few that
>>are present generally strive to set an example of
>>"How to do it".
>>Certainly the few in this NG follow that ethos.
>>
>>Your request (REQ) was possibly the worst example I have
>>ever seen here (ABCP) in more than four years of viewing
>>material posted for digitising.. and the range is amazing in its
>>ability to astound the reader.. but yours, yours takes
>>"top of the list" in Worst Ever REQs!!
>>
>>There is not a digiPerson on this planet who could produce
>>a design from that - lets call a spade a spade - CRAP!
>>
>>Yes, I could set to work and produce something similar
>>-- after maybe 20 hours of work -- but you can bet your
>>sweet bippy there would be *something* about the artwork
>>you would have a problem with.
>>Therefore the work would never be sewn out.. left discarded
>>as a "seemed like a good idea at the time'.
>>And if there is one thing that pisses a digiPerson off, it is to know
>>their work is lying in a stash somewhere never to be
>>sewn -- after being requested! WTF!
>>And **we** k n o w.
>>There are "sekrit codes" built into a digi piece that sing when they
>>are loaded to a machine with a hoop set.
>>(apols to Lee Falk)
>>
>>Simply put, only *you* know what you want
>>--->so *you* do the artwork
>>--->*you*provide the specifications as to "size"
>>--->you nominate the target material
>>---> you decide the durability required
>> IOW
>> --->*you* have to do more than plonk your post down
>>and yell "Hey YOU"... and in a banner post, no less!
>>
>>.. lets hope you "get it" straight off.
>>
>>Where you want material to read on "How to post a REQ"
>>go look for the "mini FAQ" posted.
>>Where you want WWW links to advice, do ask.
>>Your choice.
>Well After a retort like that it leaves one no doubt why there are
>very few" Aussies" as you say in this group.
Given your level of "retort' to date I am
not surprised you cannot read /comprehend.
Genetically speaking I can only hope you are
one of those imports taking refuge in Canberra.
Do take up that next appointment.
You might get lucky with chance to move
to Camooweal.. and actually then get a Life :-/
Lets see how your attitude works out for
ya.. eh? :-/
byeeeeeeeee
/sets Isew@onthetreadle.com to EdjutBin
|
|
')){kind=link}