Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!news.astraweb.com!border5.newsrouter.astraweb.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!pit-transit.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: Isew <Isew@onthetreadle.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.crafts.pictures
Subject: Re: Herb Can You Help - badge.bmp (0/1)
Message-ID: <llitc51es9tf5m482q4315tq1qomtnn6ph@4ax.com>
References: <qpgrc5d13gre7g6d904of3178kqlra509r@4ax.com> <WZnzm.321259$vp.319736@newsfe12.iad> <a6nsc59o9kb6gs3v5clclj83kin9vi6mir@4ax.com> <Y9xzm.32401$lR3.16726@newsfe25.iad>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 120
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 05:34:30 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 124.182.96.68
X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au
X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1255066470 124.182.96.68 (Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:34:30 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:34:30 EST
Organization: BigPond Internet Services
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.crafts.pictures:10046
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:24:57 +1000, hopper
<Troll5layer@home.busy.post.n0.bills.invalid> wrote:
>On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 21:44:18 GMT, in alt.binaries.crafts.pictures Isew
><Isew@onthetreadle.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:57:39 +1000, hopper
>><Troll5layer@home.busy.post.n0.bills.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:52:38 GMT, in alt.binaries.crafts.pictures Isew
>>><Isew@onthetreadle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Herb could you digitise this without the satin border and white
>>>>baground Tia
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>look very carefully
>>>i post it only once
>>I do not understand your reply
>
>I don't understand your reply, so we are
>even, yeh?
>
>>why are you so insulting
>
>Why are you so challenged by truth?
>Feeling a tad "precious" today are we, possums?
>
>Some solid advice for you to take with you.. if nothing else.
>
> Where you are going to reply to post you are not
> familiar with the style of, go read _all_ posts by that
> Author _before_ you leap to a judgement.
>
>I did, for you, hence I know _exactly_ what I have to do...
>now read on McDuff.
>
>> I only asked for someone to help digitise
>>
>Please listen very carefully.. I say this only once.
>
>Never attempt to divert the course of a thread by lying.
>Folks are a lot smarter than you give them credit for.
>
>/takes your twinky nose and rubs it in this:
>" Herb Can You Help"
>
>Herb is not "someone", at all.
>Herb is a netizen of some repute and a well respected
>character of this group and others.
>You have posted a question with an implied
>expectation - directly to a member of ABCP..
>This is not how Usenet works.
>
>And you have been reading the group long enough
>to know this IF you read anything more than replies
>to your own posts.. another 'requirement' of group
>participation.
>
>
>>this there is no need for insults.
>>
>This is your view/opinion.
>I do not share it and I _know_many others would not
>share it either.
>Trust me.. IF I wanted you to feel insulted you would
>not be responding ****at all***..
>Very possible you would instead be checked in at
>Calvary Hospital, just down the road!!
>
>You are being motivated, is all.. and I will expand to
>say why that is.
>Aussies are very few in number anywhere across Usenet.
>Without going to why that is, I say to you the few that
>are present generally strive to set an example of
>"How to do it".
>Certainly the few in this NG follow that ethos.
>
>Your request (REQ) was possibly the worst example I have
>ever seen here (ABCP) in more than four years of viewing
>material posted for digitising.. and the range is amazing in its
>ability to astound the reader.. but yours, yours takes
>"top of the list" in Worst Ever REQs!!
>
>There is not a digiPerson on this planet who could produce
>a design from that - lets call a spade a spade - CRAP!
>
>Yes, I could set to work and produce something similar
>-- after maybe 20 hours of work -- but you can bet your
>sweet bippy there would be *something* about the artwork
>you would have a problem with.
>Therefore the work would never be sewn out.. left discarded
>as a "seemed like a good idea at the time'.
>And if there is one thing that pisses a digiPerson off, it is to know
>their work is lying in a stash somewhere never to be
>sewn -- after being requested! WTF!
>And **we** k n o w.
>There are "sekrit codes" built into a digi piece that sing when they
>are loaded to a machine with a hoop set.
>(apols to Lee Falk)
>
>Simply put, only *you* know what you want
>--->so *you* do the artwork
>--->*you*provide the specifications as to "size"
>--->you nominate the target material
>---> you decide the durability required
> IOW
> --->*you* have to do more than plonk your post down
>and yell "Hey YOU"... and in a banner post, no less!
>
>.. lets hope you "get it" straight off.
>
>Where you want material to read on "How to post a REQ"
>go look for the "mini FAQ" posted.
>Where you want WWW links to advice, do ask.
>Your choice.
Well After a retort like that it leaves one no doubt why there are
very few" Aussies" as you say in this group.
|
|
')){kind=link}