| Re: Reb, what the hell are you going on about? and BTW TO: wlg (please read) |
|
| \"Reb\" Ruster (rebruster@hotmail.com) |
2009/02/04 22:35 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!news.astraweb.com!border5.newsrouter.astraweb.com!indigo.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!mauve.octanews.net!nx01.iad.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!216.196.98.140.MISMATCH!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local02.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:35:13 -0600
From: "\"Reb\" Ruster" <rebruster@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.chakotay
Subject: Re: Reb, what the hell are you going on about? and BTW TO: wlg (please read)
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:35:12 -0500
Message-ID: <vbuko4tf22krjs2780e9tl1v5hscjdfrp5@4ax.com>
References: <tgrko4dh5d9p17pa4m3vj2n8es0if2l03h@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.0/32.1071
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 17
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-iNIPPGKXxMC9qtlzKB/mbgf4X+H3lXasZEaaRRfgr+yi7yaCR2qu4rs0BW9rtaBA7GOUSgaW6sFyyJv!rgMWv3XGDOD745risqy4Y60i/9m61EFFhTtvbyA8yPowblHPpEx6z6taWx2KFiDx5psXfY+M
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.39
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.chakotay:1779
On 4 Feb 2009 22:53:01 -0600, "(the original) homer"
<homer(sexual)@springfield.net> wrote:
>Reb,
>you posted something about abiding by rules? Posts are to be made
>without restirctions and blah blah blah... I have never posted with
>restrictions, and have no clue what you are even talking about. No
>idea what the messge of the day is or whatever. And you even quoted an
>old post of mine that says please help out Jimmy... and that is
>supposed to signify what exactly?
Mainly I'm confused with the multiple nyms people are using. My
message was addressed to the person that refused to post the file
unless others posted first. The nym used was something like "Attention
Whore". The actual file was posted by "Tarheel", which is a nym you
used previously. I assumed that was you. If I am in error, then please
accept my apologies.
|
|
|