On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:50:09 +0100, g7@ufo.ufo wrote
(in article <00304712$0$21197$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>):
I agree with g7, the babies are much too young.
Even with older kids, i think adults are not to have sex with. The difference
of age and maturity makes the relationship not equal, not free.
> I prefer boys to have reached an age at which they can choose for themselves
> what they do with their privates before anyone engages them.
>
> I think your posts serve to reinforce the lowest opinions of boylovers as
> shatterers of innocence and people whose appetites know no boundaries.
>
> Aside from those critcisms, you are, of course, free to post, as I am free
> to avoid your posts. As I typically download anything I don't have and
> review it afterward, I was unable to avoid your firrst posts. Perhaps
> you'll let us know if you move on to boys who have reached the "age of
> reason" and could conceivably be put on trial for murder, like the boy in
> Arizona. You've got to wonder what that boy meant when he said his dad and
> co-worker were "suffering" as his reason for shooting them.
>
> If you took the photos, I hope you get some therapy and stop using such
> young babies to satisfy your lust. I hope you are also prepared to pay for
> the therapy they may need as the grow into maturity and figure out how you
> have betrayed them.
>
> Only when a boy can unsolicitously entice you into a sex act is it even
> vaguely pardonalble to succomb. Typically, it is the adult who is the
> aggressor with boys this young. They may masturbate themselves at that age,
> but they surely don't invite others to engage with them sexually, or take
> photos of their genitals.
>
> Hey...you asked...
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
|
|